"A new military intervention making short shrift of Libyan sovereignty -- whether or not it would be in response to a future government of national union -- is very likely to raise more problems than it seeks to resolve. Although a few Libyan voices are calling for foreign intervention, the vast majority of the people are against any foreign operation on their territory, whether conducted by the Western powers or by Arab countries. By banishing the prospect of a defeat of IS by strictly Libyan forces, a foreign intervention would discredit any government of national unity since it would be seen as a puppet of the West. It would also fuel the resentment felt by many Libyans. Although not particularly hostile to the West, they are nonetheless not unresponsive to arguments put forth by the most radical politicians of both Eastern and Western Libya, who spread various conspiracy theories, the most popular claiming that IS itself is a new way the West has found to interfere in the Arab world. A new international military intervention in Libya will therefore not contribute to any lasting solution that responds to the political and social reasons for the presence of IS in that country. This must require first and foremost the rebuilding of a legitimate Libyan state, including as many of the local military and political forces as possible.”
Jadaliyya: Arab Studies Institute
http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/24013/libya_military-intervention-would
-only-strengthen-?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=New%20Campaign&utm
_term=%2AMideast%20Brief
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/07/from-the-levant-to-libya-this-is-how
-you-beat-isis.html